6-Philosophy-Ethics-Theories-Utility

consequentialism

Actions can be right or wrong depending on consequences {consequentialism}. Actions can be right or wrong depending on result rightness or wrongness {act-consequentialism} {direct consequentialism}. Consequences can be personal or social, can be effects or states, can involve optima or only improvements, can lead to equitable distributions, or can surpass minimum thresholds. Utilitarianism is consequentialist. Actions can be right or wrong depending on consequences of choosing certain rules {indirect consequentialism} {rule-consequentialism}. However, people cannot know, pay attention to, or weigh all consequences. Perhaps, people cannot affect others much.

evolutionary ethics

People value actions, goals, and people that contribute to survival {evolutionary ethics}.

instrumental value

Things can have value {instrumental value} because they help reach goals.

pleasure theory

Ethics {pleasure theory} can depend on the most net happiness or pleasure, which can include the most equal sharing of happiness and pleasure, as in Mill's utilitarianism.

pragmatism in ethics

Right actions lead to good consequences, and wrong or bad leads to bad consequences {pragmatism, ethics}.

utilitarianism in ethics

Ethics can include the most equal sharing of happiness and pleasure {utilitarianism}, as in Mill.

Related Topics in Table of Contents

6-Philosophy-Ethics-Theories

Drawings

Drawings

Contents and Indexes of Topics, Names, and Works

Outline of Knowledge Database Home Page

Contents

Glossary

Topic Index

Name Index

Works Index

Searching

Search Form

Database Information, Disclaimer, Privacy Statement, and Rights

Description of Outline of Knowledge Database

Notation

Disclaimer

Copyright Not Claimed

Privacy Statement

References and Bibliography

Consciousness Bibliography

Technical Information

Date Modified: 2022.0225